|
Author
|
Topic: Coach K and Duke Not as Squeaky Clean as We All Think They Are?
|
catmandoo
Player
Member # 1284
|
posted 06-12-2020 08:26 PM
Arguably the biggest reason I consider the Duke Blue Devils to be my favorite college basketball team is because Mike Krzyzewski and his players and staff have always done things the right way.
Or so I thought.
For the better part of the past three decades, Krzyzewski has built the Duke men’s basketball program into one of the true titans of the sport. Coach K has amassed over 800 victories, 11 Final Four appearances and four national championships as the head man in Durham.
Arguably more impressive is that his teams have won so often while constantly staying out of trouble with the NCAA. In an era where often times winning and corruption have gone hand-in-hand in major collegiate athletics, Duke’s ability to win big and legally has been a breath of fresh air.
But with at least one blemish recently popping up that could potentially turn into a major black eye for the program, we now have to ask the question: Are Coach K and Duke not as picture perfect as we thought they were?
From reading well-respected Yahoo! Sports journalist Dan Wetzel’s recent eye-opening investigative article on former Duke forward Lance Thomas, the answer is definitely leaning towards “no, they’re not.”
To summarize, Wetzel reported in early September that, while at Duke in late 2009, Thomas bought over $97,000 worth of jewelry from a midtown Manhattan boutique jeweler. Thomas paid for $30,000 of the jewelry and was supposed to pay off the remaining balance within a two-week period after the date of purchase.
The problem is that Thomas never paid, and now the jeweler is suing the former Blue Devil as a result. Given this sticky situation, the NCAA may soon become involved and launch its own investigation.
Surely, the first question they’re likely to ask is just how did a college student like Thomas have $30,000 lying around to spend on exquisite jewelry? It’s easy to see why this could seriously stain the pristine image of Krzyzewski and his program.
Even before Wetzel’s piece hit the Internet, the college basketball experts for cbssports.com published a piece in August where they surveyed nearly 100 head coaches anonymously. They asked them which coach is the best at bending the rules but not breaking them.
Unsurprisingly, controversial Kentucky coach John Calipari topped the list. But what could be considered surprising is the fact that Krzyzewski’s name came up on the list, too.
The combination of Wetzel’s article and cbssports.com’s survey has now opened the door for fans nationwide to question whether or not Krzyzewski and his Blue Devils have really played by the rules all these years.
Of course, fans can only speculate as of right now. The NCAA has yet to launch an official investigation into the Thomas matter.
It could be tough to do so, considering how nobody from the jewelry store that’s suing Thomas wants to talk to the NCAA. Nevertheless, I (along with lots of other fans and experts) used to always believe that Coach K and his Blue Devils were as squeaky clean as they came in college basketball.
However, given what has transpired the past few weeks, now I’m not so sure what to make of my favorite team.
Link
--------------------
http://www.ukfightsong.com/
Posts: 186359 | From: st. augustine florida 32092 | Registered: Mar 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Old Norm
Administrator
Member # 1482
|
posted 06-12-2020 09:00 PM
Have you read this story on KSR?
Zion Williams - KSR
--------------------
Pray For Our Country!
Posts: 36266 | From: Western KY | Registered: Aug 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
Tiptree
Administrator
Member # 844
|
posted 06-12-2020 09:33 PM
CMD,
That article is from 2012. Clearly, nothing came of the Lance Thomas affair. Duke remained "squeaky clean".
Now, however, there is another chance for the NCAA to look under the rug at Duke. Will the result be the same?
--------------------
Tiptree
“If a nation expects to be ignorant and free, in a state of civilization, it expects what never was and never will be.” Thomas Jefferson
Posts: 13600 | From: Terre Haute, IN | Registered: Sep 2000
| IP: Logged
|
|
m hamilton
Player
Member # 127
|
posted 06-13-2020 08:09 AM
To answer your question Tip, YES! They will claim they are a private school and handle things differently than the public schools do! There will always be an excuse not to punish law breakers!
--------------------
The potus is planning 1st major tax hike since '93 in next economic package!
I still can't believe some people believed that LIAR!!!
Your whole life is determined(by) 10% what happens to you, and 90% how you handle it!!!
Posts: 123969 | From: vevay, IN USA | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged
|
|
Bama Cat
Player
Member # 153
|
posted 06-13-2020 12:55 PM
I sure don't remember reading this article in 2012. This crap statement from K that "this is just a business situation" just don't get it with me. It comes down to......did any normal students at Duke get offered the same deal. He's guilty as S _ _ _ and I hope they run him out of college BB.
The only top kids UK doesn't get that they want are the ones who are rewarded at places like Kansas and Duke. You could also throw a few more schools in that the NCAA is going to catch very soon.
[ 06-13-2020, 12:58 PM: Message edited by: Bama Cat ]
Posts: 14132 | From: berea, ky, usa | Registered: Sep 1999
| IP: Logged
|
|
rlt4uk
Player
Member # 3194
|
posted 06-13-2020 03:02 PM
quote:
Originally posted by Old Norm:
Have you read this story on KSR?
Zion Williams - KSR
With all that evidence, I hope duke gets put on probation.
--------------------
Bleeding Blue in south Alabama. Kentucky born, Kentucky bred,I'll be kentucky until i'm dead!
Posts: 9776 | From: enterprise, al 36330 | Registered: Sep 2010
| IP: Logged
|
|
ukcatfannfl
Player
Member # 1425
|
posted 06-13-2020 03:04 PM
Don't forget Cory Maggard who was ineligible to play for Duke as he had an agent and accepted money before he entered Duke and nothing came of that. We had a guy under the same circumstances and he was banned for a yr.
Hell as far as that goes, UNC had multiple b-ball and football players who never went to class and had it done for them and since other students could also take the sham courses, the ncaa sweep it under the rung.
I am glad the rules are changing on selling names, their likeness etc because they have always been paid but nothing happened! Probably at our school also!!
--------------------
ukcatfannfl
Posts: 8771 | From: Inverness, FL | Registered: Jun 2001
| IP: Logged
|
|
|
UBBFriend: Email this page to someone!
Printer-friendly view of this topic